Saturday, April 23, 2011

Analysis #5 Poststructuralism and Postmodernism

My analysis on Postsructuralism and Postmodernism revolves around the 2000 uncut version of the horror film, American Psycho, directed by Mary Harron, who also wrote the screenplay along with Guinevere Turner. The setting of the movie transpires in New York City during the 1980s. Patrick Bateman, the yuppie lead character and protagonist (if I may use the word protagonist) from the outset proclaims “There is an idea of Patrick Bateman but only an abstraction, no real me” (American Psycho). Later, he answers his fiancée, “Negative, I want to fit in,” when she prods him “Why don’t you quit your job?”  When I try to put this film in the postmodernistic perspective a couple of its tenants come to mind: There is no ultimate truth, and, there is no self without the word.  The French existentialist Jean-Paul Sartre (1905-1890) “focused on the human experience of freedom and responsibility in a godless universe. For Sartre, ‘existence is prior to essence’: because the world and human nature possess no fixed meaning, human beings are responsible for their own choices and actions” (Leitch 1196).  But is Patrick Bateman fully responsible for his murderous actions, or perhaps, partially, a victim of a cultural psychosis inflicted by the Postmodernistic Society?
Someone once said of contemporary society, “To the extent that they allow bureaucracies and entertainment to define and distract them, they live unauthentic lives.” Surely, Bateman exemplifies this by his unauthentic value system. His murderous rage ignites even over seeing better looking business cards of his yuppie colleagues, and over another colleague’s ability to get coveted reservations at an esteemed restaurant while Bateman cannot. Jean Baudrillard observes that “In consumer society, natural needs or desires have been buried under, if not totally eliminated by desires stimulated by cultural discourses (advertising, media, and the rest), which tell us what we want” (Leitch 1554).  Bateman’s true needs to murder and dissect women (predominantly) most likely stem from displaced anger brought about by his fantasy environment with no discernible outlets to sublimate his psychoses.
One might argue that his bizarre sexual activity and acts of murder reflect reality. However, these acts are cultivated through the mass media of film. He watches porno films, which include sadism-masochism, and the horror film, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, whence he formulates his wants and techniques of kinky sex and murder. Mary Harron, the film’s director, comments that “Patrick Bateman learns how to kill and have sadist-masochistic sex (and positions) through his videos" (American Psycho  BluRay DVD).  Along these lines, Baudrillard feels “sexual desire is no longer a response to a person whom we meet and know face-to-face. Rather, sexual desire is stimulated by images promulgated by the media, and we strive to make our bodies to fit those images” (Leitch 1554). Bateman even makes his body fit by doing calisthenics to these videos. This brings us to the question: Does Kant’s ideals of reason and rationalism from the Enlightenment still prevail in our Postrucuralist and Modernistic Society?
Michel Foucault and Noam Chomsky discuss this during their 1971 debate. (Foucault Chomsky Debate YouTube).  For the most part, Foucault believes that the coercive forces inherent in our society—government, corporate, educational, military—make it very difficult for humanity to maintain reason on a large scale. However, and more optimistically, Chomsky believes that “people’s creative powers to produce reasonable things will overcome the progressive structures of repression” (YouTube). Foucault interjects that even “Psychiatry, which is supposed to help people, is actually part of the power structure used in the judicial system” (YouTube). He goes on to say that Mao Zedong, the first communist revolutionary leader of China, had said that “Human nature is different between the proletariat and bourgeoisie” (YouTube). Chomsky reflects the more positive side in human nature bringing up his own civil disobedience concerning the Vietnam War. We may consider Chomsky a de facto proxy for Jürgen Habermas in this debate, who understands very well the arguments of the postmodernists and agrees that “the Enlightenment project of basing authority on reason has gone awry…we must strive to fully reintegrate the discourses of modern science, art, and politics … Enlightenment ideals gives people in post-Enlightenment societies a lever with which to move their less-than-perfect societies toward a better future” (Leitch 1569).
 Perhaps Baudrillard’s Disneyland metaphor captures most trenchantly our world and the American Psycho’s Patrick Bateman's world with these words: “Disneyland is presented as imaginary in order to make us believe that the rest, when in fact all of Los Angeles and the America surrounding it are no longer real, but the order of the hyperreal [models of a real without origin or reality (Leitch 1557)] and of simulation. It is no longer a question of a false representation of reality (ideology), but of concealing the fact that the real is no longer real, and thus of saving the reality principle” (Leitch 1565).

Works Cited

American Psycho. Dir. Mary Harron Perf.Christian Bale, William Dafoe, Jared Leto, JoshLucas, Samantha 
     Mathis, Matt Ross, Bill Sage, Chloe Sevigny, Cara Seymour, Justin Theroux, Guinevere Turner, and  
     Reese Witherspoon. Lionsgate, 2000. Blu-ray DVD. Film.

Leitch, Vincent B. Ed. The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. 2nd ed. New York:
     W.W. Norton & Company, 2010. Print.

Foucault Chomsky Debate. YouTube. 1971. Web. 22 Apr. 2011.                                                             
     http://www.YouTube.com

Friday, April 22, 2011

Reflection: Poststructuralism and Postmodernism Part 2

As a follow up of Dr. Wexler’s clips on American Psycho I watched the full version on Blue Ray DVD last night, and I have to admit it was kind of disturbing.  Then I watched it again with the director’s commentary, and her relaxed soothing voice put me more at ease. I also watched the Michel Foucault and Noam Chomsky debate again, also, as a follow up to Dr. Wexler’s clip. I know about Noam Chomsky’s great contribution to linguistics through English 302: Introduction to Modern Grammar, which I took last semester. So I plan to incorporate all of this material in my analysis for Poststructuralism and Postmodernism, which I plan to tackle tomorrow morning when I am more rested and my mind is fresh. In addition, I will bring up Disneyland briefly and discuss Jean Baudrillard’s,  “The Precession of Simulcra,” which I find fascinating. So I look forward to the assignment and then reading about Feminism and Gender Studies

Sunday, April 17, 2011

Reflection: Poststructuralism and Postmodernism


            I’m off from work next week so I took some time this weekend to reread Roland Barthes’ “Death of the Author,” primarily because it is mentioned a few times by the Poststucturalists and Postmodernists, which make Barthe’s work at the cusp between Reader Response and the Postmodern/Poststructuralst. I also reread last week’s theorists’ work of Jean Francois Lyotard, Michel Foucault, and Jean Baudrillard, all of whom I wrote notes about and therefore have a better handle of, and, consequently, may refer to them in my analysis #5 for  next week.  I had purchased the DVD The Matrix a month ago because it has been mentioned several times by students and Dr. Wexler as being pertinent to some of our readings and discussions, and I will most likely watch it tonight so I can relate it perhaps to my next analysis. Last week I also bought the American Psycho DVD and plan to watch it tomorrow night if I’ve progressed satisfactorily in my reading—if not I will watch it later in the week—as I believe Dr. Wexler will be referring to certain segments of its clips in class this Tuesday.
            I look forward to reading this week’s theorists, especially Jacques Derrida, whom I believe piggybacks on Barthes.  Tomorrow and Tuesday, I will read the required works, so, hopefully, it will be fresh in my mind for class Tuesday.
Last week, I appreciated Dr. Wexler injecting a quote from Elie Wiesel”s biographical novel, Night, from one of the concentration camp inmates, said after watching a Jewish teenage inmate die slowly from a rope put around his neck by the Nazis. When a fellow inmate asked the other inmate “Where is God?” the other inmate answered “He just died,” which metaphorically, as Dr. Wexler noted, represented the end of the Modern Period.  A couple of students took issue with this statement because “five million other people were also killed by the Nazis.”  This is tragic and true of course; however, from my observations, it seems in vogue to marginalize the Jewish Holocaust and Israel’s right to exist.  I mention this as a Jew because I see and have seen anti-Semitism everywhere, overtly, indirectly, and latent.  
As a high school teacher, I recently had purchased forty-five Night novels from special funding at my school for my students to read, which I should be getting in a week. Last month I took about eighty-five students to the Museum of Tolerance in West Los Angeles, where the Jewish Holocaust and other Genocides were represented in their exhibitions. Perhaps by reading Night and experiencing the museum, a few prejudiced and angry adolescents’ minds will go through a reformation and see things clearer.